When compliance is not the same as reliability
How trust companies can strengthen everyday reliability as compliance grows and people, generations and circumstances change.
The review is complete. Has the important change been understood?
A file can contain the required documents without making the significance of a new development clear.
An experienced officer may know why an arrangement needs special attention, while a colleague taking over sees only the latest review.
A familiar procedure may no longer fit the circumstances. A new generation of beneficiaries may bring needs and expectations that earlier decisions did not anticipate.
Completing the process and understanding the situation are connected, but they are not the same task.
This conversation explores how a trust company can meet its obligations while strengthening its ability to notice important changes, respond appropriately and preserve the reasoning behind its decisions.
How can a trust company remain genuinely reliable when compliance grows, procedures multiply, and the people and circumstances it serves keep changing?
Drawing on Still Not Safe, how can a trust company tell whether its growing compliance workload is improving reliability, or mainly producing more completed checks and reports? What should directors look at beyond whether a control has been completed?
When a situation does not fit an internal procedure, how can a firm distinguish a sound, authorised adaptation from a workaround that quietly increases risk? When should the officer stop and escalate rather than improvise?
When beneficiaries and experienced officers change, what should a firm preserve from earlier decisions, and what should it question afresh, so that it neither loses understanding nor carries outdated assumptions into the next generation?
How can a firm get the knowledge of the person closest to a problem into the decision in time, while remaining clear about who has authority and responsibility to decide?
A firm in transition
An illustrative scenario for discussion.
A trust company has introduced additional checks, approvals and reporting requirements. Its dashboard shows completed reviews and no reported incidents.
At the same time, experienced officers are preparing to leave. Some recurring difficulties are resolved through informal workarounds that are not visible in the dashboard.
A new generation of beneficiaries has different circumstances and expectations. Earlier decisions are documented, but their assumptions and reasoning are difficult to recover.
The firm can show that its reviews have been completed.
How would its directors establish whether the organisation is keeping pace with what has changed?
Kathleen M. Sutcliffe
Kathleen Sutcliffe’s research examines how organisations cope with uncertainty and become more reliable and resilient. She has studied these questions in healthcare, wildland firefighting, oil and gas, chemical processing and other demanding environments.
Her work also examines how information, communication, learning and organisational design affect a team’s ability to recognise and respond to changing conditions.
This conversation brings that experience to fiduciary work. It asks which lessons are useful for a trust company, where the comparison has limits, and what practitioners might examine differently in their own firms.
Still Not Safe examines how patient safety became increasingly organised through systems of measurement, management and regulatory compliance.
For trustees, it raises a practical question:
How do we know whether more controls are creating greater reliability, rather than simply more evidence that controls have been completed?
Managing the Unexpected examines how organisations sustain reliable performance when conditions change and unexpected events arise.
For trustees, the relevance is not that high-risk organisations provide a ready-made model.
It is the underlying question:
How does an organisation remain attentive to what is actually happening when procedures, expectations and reality begin to diverge?
If every review is green and no incident has been reported, what should a trust director still be looking for?
The format
Join the conversation
For trustees, trust company directors, family office practitioners, and governance and compliance professionals responsible for decisions affecting families across jurisdictions.
Zoom will email you the invitation and a reminder. See our Privacy Notice.