The Governance Platform for Trustees
Bring decisions, obligations and the evidence behind them into one place. See what needs attention, who is responsible and how each decision was reached.
AI proposes. Officer decides. Platform executes. System verifies.
Fiduciary judgement remains human.
The complete workflow
The full walkthrough, including how the AI proposal is kept apart from the officer's decision and how the record is inspected afterwards, is shown in a private demonstration, under a prior NDA.
Problems and outcomes
When information is spread across inboxes and systems, finding out what is happening and reconstructing decisions takes time. VERIDUCIA brings the work and its record together.
Continuity
Off sick, on leave or gone. Which requests are urgent, which deadlines pass this week, which entities are exposed? Today the answer sits in a mailbox you are not copied on.
With VERIDUCIA
The portfolio is visible as it stands: urgent, overdue, at risk, each item with an owner. Work is reassigned in the system, not reconstructed from a handover.
Visibility
Filings, reviews, fees due and open matters live across systems, inboxes and memory. Answering the board or the supervisor means asking someone to compile it.
With VERIDUCIA
Every obligation has an owner and a date. Officer, team leader, compliance, legal counsel and director see the same record at their level, and can go down to the file, the document, the email.
Reconstruction
A distribution is made. The deed is in one system, the approval in an inbox, the reasoning in the memory of whoever handled it. Months later, someone reconstructs it.
With VERIDUCIA
Each decision closes with a contemporaneous record: what was considered, how AI was used, who decided, when and under what authority. The reasoning is read, not rebuilt.
Supporting functions draw on the same record: fees due, supervisory reporting and the Meeting Pack for a board or client meeting. VERIDUCIA does not replace your accounting, banking or compliance systems. It records and routes the work that depends on them.
The platform in use
Who decided, when, and what follows. Written at the moment of decision, not reconstructed later.
A director, an auditor or a board member sees the decision, the person responsible, the date and the follow-up. The detail sits behind it, one level down.
The AI proposal is recorded as a proposal. The officer's decision is recorded as the decision. They are never merged.
Explore the complete workflow in a private demonstration (under a prior NDA).
How it works
Four roles, kept apart by design. Only the authorised officer can make the fiduciary decision.
Reads the file, surfaces the relevant clauses and prior decisions, and puts forward labelled options. It never holds authority.
The authorised officer decides and writes the reasoning, under the mandate in force. Compliance review and fiduciary judgement stay human.
Routes the decision through the authorised workflow: reviewers, follow-ups, documents generated, owners notified.
Confirms the authorised steps were followed, seals the record on close and keeps every later correction as a new entry.
“Executes” and “verifies” refer to the authorised workflow and to the controls your firm configures. They do not by themselves mean bank execution, legal correctness or a substitute for professional judgement.
Fiduciary judgement remains human. Automation routes, records and generates. Compliance review, fiduciary judgement and accounting verification remain with the people responsible for them.
Research behind the platform
A reference document on governance, inventory, testing and documentation of AI use by supervised institutions. Cited for context; it is not a certification or endorsement of VERIDUCIA.
The Trustee's Evolving Standard of Care
Frédéric Sanz
Governing the tools that inform fiduciary decisions has become part of the trustee's standard of care. Eight fiduciary tests for evaluating AI systems, adopting them with proper care, and preserving the reasoning behind the decisions they inform.
Discover the book →VERIDUCIA is the working form of these principles.
About
Frédéric Sanz
Founder, Fiduciacorp
Frédéric spent his career inside fiduciary practice, at J.P. Morgan Private Bank, TMF Group, CSC / Intertrust and Rhone Trustees, administering trust and wealth structures across twelve jurisdictions: approving payments, running KYC, delivering board reports, closing compliance gaps. The operational problems VERIDUCIA addresses are problems he has worked through himself.
Fiduciacorp develops VERIDUCIA and the underlying work on AI-assisted fiduciary decision-making: human judgement, documented authority, contemporaneous records and verifiable integrity.
Questions
No. It puts forward a labelled proposal with the sources it relied on. The authorised officer decides and writes the reasoning. The record keeps the proposal and the decision distinct, and shows which is which.
Everything that is a judgement: the decision itself, its reasoning, compliance review and sign-off, and accounting verification. VERIDUCIA routes, records and generates. It does not take over those responsibilities and does not replace your compliance function.
A closed record is sealed. If something needs correcting, a new entry is created that refers to the original, which is preserved unchanged. An examiner sees both, in order.
In phases agreed with your firm: an initial set of files, your mandates and review rules configured as they stand, one agreed case walked through, then a review of the record before deciding the next phase. Scope and timing are agreed at each step.
VERIDUCIA works alongside your existing accounting, banking and compliance systems rather than replacing them. Which connections are in scope, and how documents and data move between systems, is defined per engagement and confirmed in writing.
Request a demonstration
All full demonstrations take place under a prior NDA. We use an illustrative case unless another scope is agreed in advance.
